A search for the 'perfect' ones
(2009 Jan blog post)
! Note !
Web links, images, and text MAY be added
(or changed), if I ever re-visit this page.
INTRODUCTION to earbuds and the search
In 2009, I was continually looking for a pair of ear-buds (or 'ear-pieces' or 'miniature ear-phones') that satisfy several conditions:
I have NOT found totally satisfactory earbuds as of this date (2009 Jan).
But I have found a couple of models that are suitable for 5K runs, if not for longer, sweatier runs.
The kinds of earbuds that are usually supplied with portable MP3 players are agony to my ears.
Those earbuds are circular and hard --- not at all a good fit to my inner ear. After wearing them only a few minutes, my ears are in extreme agony. I cannot image a less ergonomic earbud.
These devices would surely have made ideal instruments of torture during the Inquisition. They would have easily made Galileo concede that the sun orbits the earth.
On this issue of comfort, I have found that earbuds with foam or soft rubber-like padding are the best bets for comfort during a run.
However, the challenge seems to be to find ones that stay in one's ears while running --- especially during sweaty runs.
Sound reproduction quality
On the issue of good sound reproduction, it is advisable to find earbuds that offer good frequency reproduction in the range of at least 15 Herz to 20,000 Herz (cycles per second) --- while ranges of about 6 to 23,000 are possible.
However, some earbuds do not state the frequency response range on the packaging --- and some probably fudge the numbers, especially the lower limit (the bass response).
I have seen some earbuds (Sony brand) that advertise 6 to 23,000 Herz, but when you read the user reviews on sites like amazon.com or epinions.com, you find that users find the frequency response is really quite horrible.
I do not know if you can trust these reviews. I have seen a few reviews of earbuds that I rate highly in sound quality (see below), but some reviews --- a definite minority --- have rated their sound quality as very poor. Can this be due to quality control problems in manufacturing?
I think that the best way to find earbuds that give good music reproduction is to buy them and try them yourself --- or, if the earbuds are very expensive, look for user reviews --- and check whether a significant percentage of the reviews rate the sound quality as poor.
I am leary of earbuds that cost more than $30. In too many cases, the user reviews on them have been quite disappointing.
On the other hand, I have found at least a few earbuds that are quite adequate in sound reproduction and in comfort (listed in a table below) --- and they cost less than $20, if you look for best prices on them.
Furthermore, I know a runner who got expensive earbuds only to find that sweat caused them to rust and disintegrate.
For reasons of damage and loss and disappointment, I think it is better to find good earbuds in the sub-$30 range.
In fact, I have found ones quite adequate for running in the $4 to $6 range --- at a Ross discount store.
The safety issue
On many forums, I see people advising against earbuds for running because they cut down on sound of on-coming cars.
I do not find this a problem. I do not turn the volume up super loud --- and I look both ways before crossing the street. (Knock on wood.)
My ratings plan
I plan to post info on earbuds on this web page --- maker, model, cost, and comments on
along with my rating based on a 1 to 5 scale.
I will mostly devote space to earbuds that I have found adequate, but I may occasionally add info on earbuds that are far less than adquate and that should be avoided.
For example, I tried a pair of 'SkullCandy' earbuds, but found that with each jogging step I took, a rumble sound was produced in the earbuds --- apparently due to a rather flimsy or poorly mounted diaphragm.
I returned them and have not tried any further SkullCandy earbuds.
Following is a table of some earbuds that I have evaluated --- according to the issues outlined above.
CLICK on any of the images
in the table below to see a larger image.
And click on the Back button of your
web browser to return to this page.
1. Earbud Make, Model,
My Overall Rating (1-5)
|2. Earbud Image||3. Rating of comfort, stay-ability, sound||4. Comments|
Rating: 4.5 of 5
4.8 of 5
3.5 of 5
4.7 of 5
2XL 'Nuevo Sonido'
Rating: 4.5 of 5
4.8 of 5
4.5 of 5 (preliminary)
4.2 of 5
Some Web Searches
You can do web searches for other earbuds suitable for running. On 4 Jan 2009, Google showed that a search on the keywords "earbuds for running" would result in about 422,000 hits.
Here is a DuckDuckGo WEB SEARCH on keywords
Reviews on Amazon
You can do a search for 'earbuds' on amazon.com to see reviews and 1-to-5-star ratings on many types of earbuds --- many of which cost less than $30.
It is best to find earbuds with at least 5 reviews and at least a 4-star (out of 5) overall rating.
It seems that almost invariably, on amazon.com, the earbuds (or ANY products) with only one review have a 5-star rating.
I like to look at the 1 and 2 star ratings first --- to see what might be the Achilles heel(s) of the product.
Some other earbud makers
There are some Jensen, Sennheiser, Philips, and JVC earbuds that I would like to try in the future.
Here are some DuckDuckGo WEB SEARCHES on those brands, via keywords:
I have tried some Philips with ear clips, but they were quite uncomfortable.
My encounter with a couple of ear clip equipped ear buds were disappointing.
Bottom of this
To return to a previously visited web page location, click on the
Back button of your web browser, a sufficient number of times.
OR, use the History-list option of your web browser.
Or you can scroll up, to the top of this page.
Page was created 2009 Jan 04.